Recent work in consciousness science has proposed the iterative natural kinds (INK) strategy (Bayne et al., 2024) as a principled way to extend tests for consciousness beyond humans by grounding them in population similarity rather than intuition or specific test outcomes. While influential, this strategy remains largely conceptual, lacking a formal framework that specifies how populations, evidence, and similarity relations should be represented and updated over time.
This project aims to develop a minimal, formal “toy” framework that captures the core logic of the INK strategy in a transparent and extensible way. Rather than testing real systems or proposing new consciousness measures, the project focuses on formalization: clarifying how evidence from a consensus population could rationally license extensions to nearby populations, and how uncertainty should be updated as new evidence accumulates. The resulting framework is intended as a foundational tool for future empirical and theoretical work on consciousness, AI sentience, and related constructs.
University College London, UK
I am an incoming MPhil/PhD student in philosophy at UCL. Before I was an undergrad at the University of Michigan’s Weinberg institute for Cognitive Science, a visiting student at UCL Faculty of Brain Sciences affiliated with the MetaLab, and an AI Fellow at the Institute of Philosophy. I spent my first-year in the Cognitive Science MA programme at The University of Edinburgh. I am most interested in the theoretical foundations of cognitive science and its implications to the responsible development of AI, with a focus on consciousness, agency, and understanding. Outside of these I enjoy alternative music, post-modern fictions, and random streetwalking.